Is iomaí cor sa saol, go mór mhór i saol an taighde. Chuir scéalta
nua suimiúla spreagúla moill ar an mblagphosta seo agus, nuair a thosnaíos á
scríobh, tháinig cor eile sa scéilín atá á roinnt agam libh anois.
Gheall mé mí Eanáir seo caite go mbeadh tuairisc eile agam
daoibh ar Man of Aran. Thart ar 1972,
mealladh an Meiriceánach George C. Stoney (1916-2012) go hÁrainn don gcéad
uair. Theastaigh uaidh scéal neamhghnách a shinsir ansiúd (a mhínigh Tim
Robinson sa leabhar Stones of Aran:
Labyrinth, lgh.141-2) a fhiosrú. Ach, mar scannánóir cáiliúil faisnéise, mheall
Man of Aran é freisin. I 1979,
d’eisigh sé a scannán féin faoi dhéanamh scannán Uí Fhlaithearta, How the Myth Was Made. Sa scannán sin,
feictear Stoney in éindí le Harry Watt – Sasanach a d’oibrigh mar chúntóir
léiriúcháin ar Man of Aran – ag
breathnú tríd an ábhar a bhí fágtha i dteachín an Man of Aran i gCill Mhuirbhigh ag Robert Flaherty i ndeireadh 1933.
Féach anseo grianghraf de chriú fiosrach Stoney ag féachaint ar an
sean-trealamh scannánaíochta – i bhfómhar 1976, is dóigh liom.
Ó chlé: Harry Watt, James Brown, agus Paul Barnes, c.1976. George C. Stoney a ghlac. Le caoinchead Documentary Educational Resources www.der.org |
Sa teach an lá sin, d’aimsigh Stoney agus Watt ríleanna
glugair de chuid Man of Aran. Roinn
Stoney féin liom an scéal sular bhásaigh sé: seoladh iomlán an ábhair scannáin a
frítheadh an uair úd go Stiúideó Ardmore i mBré, Co. Chill Mhantáin, ach, nuair
a thug Stoney cuairt ar an ionad sin mí ina dhiaidh sin, dúradh leis gur caitheadh
amach é trí thimpist – rud a chur díomá an domhain air, dar ndóigh.
Bronnann an scéilín seo comhthéacs úr ar ghrianghraf eile
atá anois i gcartlann Getty Images, grianghraf a léiríonn go ndearna Flaherty
iarracht bhreise an íomhá d’Árainn a bhí cruthaithe aige a smachtú: nuair a
thug sé a chuairt dheireanach ar an oileán i Meán Fómhair 1949, dhóigh sé
roinnt de na ríleanna glugair. Cérbh iad na radharcanna a ndearna sé iarracht a
ghlanadh ó chuimhne na ndaoine? Agus cérbh iad na radharcanna nár mhiste leis
go ndéanfaí a mheas mar chuid dá oidhreacht ealaíne?
Ach féach cor eile sa scéal. I
gcaint dar teideal “Must a Filmmaker Always Leave His Mark?” a thug Stoney
uaidh i mBealtaine 1978 san Astráil, dúirt sé:
Some 6,000 feet of outtakes were discovered in Dublin a few years ago by Alf MacLochlainn of Ireland’s National Library. These show Flaherty’s Aran characters going through all the necessary foolishness of making old-style films.
Is mó seans gur inis MacLochlainn féin do Stoney cad a bhí
sna míreanna glugair seo. Ach ní fios go fóill céard a d’éirigh don ábhar sin
ná cén fáth gur mhair sé tamall i mBaile Átha Cliath. Tá bailiúcháin ábharthacha
sa Leabharlann Náisiúnta nach bhfuil cláraithe go hiomlán go fóill. Mar sin, ní féidir a bheith cinnte más ann atá siad
anois nó nach ea. Leanfaidh an bhleachtaireacht!
*
The twists and turns of the researching life have delayed
this post but have also yielded some new, intriguing tales that I hope to
share with you in due course. For now, here is a story I promised you last
January, another chapter in the saga of Man
of Aran.
Around 1972, the American film-maker George C. Stoney
(1916-2012) visited Aran for the first time. He wanted to investigate the
intriguing history of his ancestors there (outlined by Tim Robinson in Stones of Aran: Labyrinth, pp.141-2) but
he was also lured by the film Man of Aran.
In 1979, he released his own documentary on the making of Flaherty’s film,
entitled How the Myth Was Made. In
that film, we see Stoney and Harry Watt – an Englishman who worked as
production assistant on Man of Aran –
discovering materials that Flaherty had left behind in the Man of Aran cottage in Cill Mhuirbhigh in late 1933. This
photograph shows Stoney’s inquisitive crew examining the old film equipment –
in the autumn of 1976, I believe.
In the cottage that day, Stoney and Watt found outtake reels
from Man of Aran. What happened next Stoney
himself relayed to me before he died: the entirety of the film material they
found was shipped to Ardmore Studios in Bray, Co. Wicklow, but, when he visited
the studios a month later, he was told it had been accidentally disposed of –
to his great dismay, naturally.
Stoney’s story gives new meaning to another photograph,
which survives in the archives of Getty Images, a photograph showing Flaherty
attempting once again to marshal his image of Aran: on his final visit to Aran
in September 1949, he burned some of the outtake reels. So, what scenes did he try
to wipe from local memory? And what scenes did he deem fit for inclusion in his
artistic legacy?
There is yet another twist in the tale. In a lecture
entitled “Must a Filmmaker Always Leave His Mark?” delivered in May 1978 in Canberra,
Australia, Stoney said:
It is more likely that MacLochlainn himself told Stoney what was in those outtake reels. However, it is, as yet, unknown what happened to that material or why it survived for a time in Dublin. There are some as yet unlisted materials in the National Library of Ireland that may hold the answers but, for the moment, the mystery remains – and the detective work continues!Some 6,000 feet of outtakes were discovered in Dublin a few years ago by Alf MacLochlainn of Ireland’s National Library. These show Flaherty’s Aran characters going through all the necessary foolishness of making old-style films.